Causes of Civil War Essay - 1835 Words

Causes Of Civil War As members of the Futurist of America Association, we have been assigned to look specifically at the cause of the American Civil #War. There are five aspects that could of led to the Civil War and they are Westward Movement, Social Change, Froeign Policy Development, Government/Politics Development, and Economic Development. Out of the five aspects, Economic Development is the best reason for the eventual Civil War. First, Westward Movement could of led to American Civil War because of the Louisiana Purchase, Wilmont Proviso, Kansas-Nebraska Act, Popular Sovereignity, Compromise of 1850, Missouri Compromise, Bleeding Kansas, California Gold Rush, Manifest Destiny, and the Mistreatment of Native†¦show more content†¦Prohibiton deals with the banning of alcohol . Religious groups consider drinking alcohol is a sin and women being abuse rosed. Poverity and crime rose, so the Anti-Saloon League was formed. It was organize in Ohio by women, who marched to saloons to make them give up their businesses. Abolitionist Movement stated with the Quarkers, who thought it was a sin to own slaves. Frederick Douglass, who a runaway slave, became one of the most effective voices against slavery. He started the Nortstar, which brought the cruelities of slavery to the attention of the North. William Lloyd Garrison published the Liberator, which started the antislavery moverment, in Boston. The Dred Scot Case was where a slave from Missouri went to Wisconsin and got married. The court had to decide if was Scott was a slave or free man. Uncle Toms Cabin written by Harriet Breecher tells about the mistreatment of slaves in the South. Social Change could of led to the Civil War by the Womens Rights Movement, Prohibition, and Abolitionists Movemnt, but did not because the ideas were consider too radical at the time. The Womens Rights Movemet did nothing to separate the Norh from the South. Men in the North and the South believed it was too extreme for women to have equal rights because they thought women as nothing more than child barriers and housekeepers. Prohibition wasShow MoreRelatedCauses of the Civil War951 Words   |  4 PagesCAUSE OF THE CIVIL WAR In 1860, the world s greatest nation was locked in Civil War. The war divided the country between the North and South. There were many factors that caused this war, but the main ones were the different interpretations of the Constitution by the North and South, the Kansas-Nebraska Act, and the arrival of Lincoln in office. These factors were very crucial in the bringing upon of the destruction of the Union. They caused immediate war. In 1791, the tenth amendment wasRead MoreThe Causes Of The Civil War1016 Words   |  5 Pages In 1861, a Civil War broke out in the United States when the South declared their independence from the Union.  There is a great amount of reasons that people can argue how the Civil War was started. However, what most people don’t understand, is that most of the events leading up to the Civil War were related to slavery.  Slavery was the core of the North and South’s conflict, which led to a very vicious feud.   The immediate cause of the war was slavery. Southern states, including the 11 statesRead MoreThe Causes Of The Civil War1409 Words   |  6 PagesThe causes of the Civil War were complex and have been controversial since the country began. Some causes include; states’ rights, economics, and slavery. The most recognizable and popular cause is slavery. The freeing of the slaves was an important moral issue at the time and one of the greatest causes of the civil war. It was only by carefully avoiding the moral issue involved in slavery that Northerners and Southerners could meet on any common ground. (Goldston, 79). The time came in which ourRead MoreThe Cause of the Civil War800 Words   |  4 Pages The Cause of the Civil War Generally, it is thought to be the South’s fault for causing the Civil War. Contrary to popular belief, the Civil War was mainly provoked by the North; through using the federal government to overtake the South, removing slavery which would destroy Southern economy, and creating the moral issue of slavery. The North was the primary reason for the start of a war that ripped our country apart. The North had full control over the federal government and used that to suppressRead MoreCivil War Causes1382 Words   |  6 Pages Causes of the Civil War John Brown’s Raid vs. Industrial Revolution John Brown’s Raid was a more influential cause to the civil war than the Industrial Revolution. The Industrial Revolution caused incompability between the North and the South. The North relied on wage laborers with the new machine age economy while the South relied heavily on slaves. So, the North did not need slaves for their economyRead MoreCauses Of The Civil War1740 Words   |  7 PagesThe Civil War was not an event that erupted overnight or something that no one had seen coming. It was a result of long stemming conflicts. â€Å"The road to civil war was complex and multi-faceted† (Wells, 1). These conflicts kept creating a divide amongst the states in the nation. The divide finally became so great, that the United States split into the Confederacy (South) and the Union (North), and fighting erupted. â€Å" â€Å"The Civil War,† Randall Jimerson observes, â€Å"became a total war involving the entireRead MoreThe Causes Of The Civil War1238 Words   |à ‚  5 PagesGalindo Mr. Scheet AP U.S History 5 November 2017 Unit 4 Essay The initial causes of the Civil War have been previously discussed and analyzed by historians, but have remained one of the most controversial debates, due to its numerous causes that created the most devastating war in American history. The country had been avoiding the disputes that would later become the causes of the civil war for decades. The Mexican War is proof that the issue of slavery was put on hold by President James K. PolkRead MoreCause of the Civil War1296 Words   |  6 PagesHistory 11 12/17/2006 The root causes and precipitating events that led to the Civil War (1861-1865) The Civil War between northern and southern states was a consequence of contradictions of two social systems inside the country. At the basis of these contradictions was a question of slavery, completely determining economic and political interests of South. North strived to enforce Federal government power to protect their own economic stability. As a result the South wanted a separationRead MoreCauses of the Civil War1489 Words   |  6 PagesThe Causes Of The Civil War The Political War The North and South fought over politics, mainly the idea of slavery. Basically the South wanted and needed it and the North did not want it at all. The South was going to do anything they could to keep it. This was the issue that overshadowed all others. At this time the labor force in the South had about 4 million slaves. These slaves were very valuable to the slaveholding planter class. They were a huge investment to Southerners and if taken awayRead MoreThe Causes Of Civil War2004 Words   |  9 PagesGà ¶ksel What are the causes of Civil War? Do ethnic determinants play an important role? Why are certain parts of Africa characterized by ethnic conflict while other parts remain relatively calm? The conventional understanding on the causes of civil war especially within African countries, to a considerable degree, has being predominantly characterized to draw its root on ethnic divergences. However, such premise appear extremely difficult to be true, owing to the fact that civil war is a complex action

A Doll s House By Henrik Ibsen - 929 Words

A Doll’s House, written by Henrik Ibsen, has long been a thought provoking play. Since its release, groups of people have accepted this with admiration or hostility. Though the story appears moderately innocent and light-hearted, there is much conflict. The conflict present midst scenes does not simply exist between the multiple characters, which exists between Helmer and Krogstad for example, but in the character’s thoughts. Nora has faced much difficulty in hopes of her husband, Torvald Helmer, not discovering her long-kept secret. Through her trial of not allowing Torvald to achieve this knowledge, she begins to mentally break; she contemplates suicide, but runs away from her family and determines to turn over a new leaf in her life. Typically known, this play was written in 1879. This is written one year after the initial Women’s Suffrage Amendment was proposed to Congress in the United States. Interestingly, the initial Amendment was written exactly how it w as published and put into law 40 years after A Doll’s House was published. This was a trying time for women; the male population (especially Caucasian adult males) controlled decisions of daily life and politically. Woman of this time period were known as â€Å"Victorian Women.† They were neither granted liberties to vote nor to be the official voice of a household. Victorian women were to remain at home to do chores and care for the family, while the husband left to provide their main source of income. Society had aShow MoreRelatedHenrik Ibsen s A Doll House1563 Words   |  7 Pages In the play, A Doll House by Henrik Ibsen, the title itself symbolizes the dependent and degraded role of the wife within traditional marriages. Ibsen portrayed the generous nature root into women by society, as well as the significant action of this nature, and lastly the need for them to find their own voice in a world ruled by men. Ibsen wrote this play in 1879, this is the era where women were obedient to men, tend the children until their husband came home, and stood by the Cult of DomesticityRead MoreA Doll s House By Henrik Ibsen1717 Words   |  7 Pagesâ€Å"A Doll, a Partner, and a Change† Social movement of women liberation toward equal rights and independence has been a big subject in human history. It happens not only in Europe but also all over the world. Though making progress, this movement has been advancing slowly and encountered backslashes from time to time. Maybe there is something deeply hidden which the society has not figured out yet, even women themselves. What do women want, freedom or good life? Most of the time, they are notRead MoreA Doll s House By Henrik Ibsen1291 Words   |  6 Pages A Doll s House by Henrik Ibsen, is a play that has been written to withstand all time. In this play Ibsen highlights the importance of women’s rights. During the time period of the play these rights were neglected. Ibsen depicts the role of the woman was to stay at home, raise the children and attend to her husband during the 19th century. Nora is the woman in A Doll House who plays is portrayed as a victim. Michael Meyers said of Henrik Ibsen s plays: The common denominator in many of IbsenRead MoreA Doll s House By Henrik Ibsen1288 Words   |  6 Pages Henrik Ibsen’s A Doll’s House is based in the Victorian society of the 19th century. It assesses the many struggles and hardships that women faced because of marriage â€Å"laws† that were crucial during that time period. The society was male- dominated with no equality. Nora is the protagonist in A Doll’s House and the wife of a man named Torvald. This play is about Nora’s voyage to recognizing her self- determination and independence. She transforms from a traditional, reserved woman to a new, independentRead MoreA Doll s House By Henrik Ibsen1298 Words   |  6 Pagesâ€Å"There is beauty in truth, even if it s painful. Those who lie, twist life so that it looks tasty to the lazy, brilliant to the ignorant, and powerful to the weak. But lies only strengthen our defects. They don t teach anything, help anything, fix anything or cure anything. Nor do they develop one s character, one s mind, one s heart or one s soul.† (Josà © N. Harris). Nora Helmer’s choice to lie and deceive is inappropriate and wrong for women to do to her husband during this time period; itRead MoreA Doll s House By Henrik Ibsen1037 Words   |  5 PagesHenrik Ibsen s A Doll s House is a work of literature genius. This three-act play involves many literary technics that are undermined by the average reader such as the fact that the plot shows the main characters Torvald and his wife Nora live the perfect life. An ironic paradox based around the fact that Nora and Torvald’s relationship is the complete opposite of perfect. Also, bringing upon a conflict as well, appearance versus reality. These little hidden meanings within stories are what areRead MoreHenrik Ibsen s A Doll House Essay1501 Words   |  7 PagesHenrik Ibsen’s play â€Å"A Doll House† was set in the Victorian era, a time where women were highly respected. Women in this time period did not work, they had nannies to take care of their children and maids to take care of their homes. Many women had no real responsibilities, they spent their time having tea parties and socializing with their friends. Henrik Ibsen dared to show the realism of the Victorian era while everyone else would only focus on the romantic aspect. In the play, â€Å"A Doll House†Read MoreA Doll s House : Henrik Ibsen962 Words   |  4 PagesDrama Analysis A Doll’s House (Henrik Ibsen) And Trifles (Susan Glaspell) In comparing both dramas, the overwhelming aspect of convergence between both is the open discussion of gender identity. Both dramas make similar points about what it means to be a woman. Modern society in both dramas is constructed with men holding power over women. This is seen in Trifles in how men like George Henderson and Mr. Hale are myopic. The premise of the drama is how women worry over trifles, and the dismissiveRead MoreA Doll s House By Henrik Ibsen1421 Words   |  6 PagesIn A Doll’s House, Henrik Ibsen examines conventional roles of men and women in the nineteenth century. In the play, Nora exemplifies the conventional feminine standard during that period. She seems to be powerless and confines herself through high standard expectations, demonstrating what the role of a women would be as a wife and mother. The protagonist of A Doll’s House is a woman named Nora Helmer. Ibsen shows how Nora’s design of perfect life gradually transforms when her sec ret unravels. InRead MoreA Doll s House By Henrik Ibsen876 Words   |  4 PagesA Doll’s House by Henrik Ibsen A Doll’s House takes place in the home of Torvald and Nora Helmer. Through conversation with Nora’s good friend Kristine Linde it is revealed that Mr. Helmer was ill around the same time Nora’s father died. Luckily Nora’s father left her enough money that Torvald and Nora could go on a life saving trip to Italy. But the truth comes out when we find out Nora’s father did not leave her a penny. We find out that Nora got a hold of the money through a loan but she signed

Science vs. Nature as a Means of Obtaining Perfection in...

Although we may mask our insecurities with false confidence and bravado, deep down most people crave perfection. As the majority of us learn as we age, this idea of â€Å"perfection† is unobtainable. The older we get, the more we tend to accept the flaws and imperfections that make us individuals. However, there are others who never learn the hard lesson of acceptance. Instead they spend ridiculous amounts of money on surgeries, creams and concoctions in order to rid themselves of these marks and insecurities. It’s a constant battle, a fork in the road if you may, between science and nature. On one side there’s the high-road of nature and acceptance, and on the other there’s the scientific shortcut that, in reality, just continues to mask the original problem. The Birthmark leads us to believe that this is perhaps a topic Hawthorne struggled with himself. Hawthorne clearly displays his decided distaste for science and its unnatural ways in his short story, The Birthmark. Aylmer, the main character of the story, is a brilliant scientist/alchemist. He possesses a belief in mans ultimate control over nature, and thinks there is nothing man cant overcome (Harun). His obsession with his wife Georgiana’s small birth mark, which resembles a hand, begins after they’re married. Aylmer is fixated with the idea of Georgianas perfection; he believes that in order for him to experience perfect love, he must have a perfect woman to love (Norman). His obsession and distaste gradually wear

Organisational Culture in Construction System †MyAssignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about the Organisational Culture in Construction System. Answer: Introduction: Organisational culture is something which is extremely important for an organisation to make sure the organisational environment is suitable for operations. Organisational culture is the way an organisation places itself among the employees and the way it does things. In the contemporary business environment the discussion of organisation culture stands to be important as most of the organisations are focused on gaining competitive advantage which would only happen if the organisation is able to make sure that all the different employees of the company are working towards the overall growth and development of the organisation. The needs and wants of people are insatiable and hence it is important to stay under a culture that supports an individual to effectively understand the society. Similarly organisational culture has evolved over the years which have become effective for the operations of an organisation (Carlstrm and Ekman, 2012). As per the classical theory of culture it is defined as the environment under which people learn and develop beliefs and ideas and meaning of their lives and also understands the value of staying in the society which largely helps to improve the overall productivity of the organisation. The organisational culture is different in different organisations and hence it is important for the organisation to understand the suitability of the organisational culture implemented in the organisation. As per the top philosophers and anthropologists different people have different perspective of culture which is why nobody could be said wrong as per their perception of culture. Since the present discussion is not about the societal culture and is highly related to the aspect of business it is important to mention that businesses normally believe in doing things in a specific way which is regarded as culture (Huhtala et al., 2013). For an organisation there could be different cultures in different levels of the organisation with one culture at the helm which helps all the employees to focus on the organisational goals and objectives. It is important for the organisation to understand its own values and principles which helps to set up a strong business motive and also helps to influence the employees and establish a professional culture in the organisation which would help to get the best possible result from the employees (Rameezdeen and Gunarathna, 2012). Organisational culture largely involves the different strictures, norms, values of an organisation that helps the organisation to build up a strong organisation and prepare its employees accordingly. To conclude it could be said that organisational culture is the amalgamation of personal and professional cultures of the entities involved with an organisation that makes a unique environment in the organisation allowing the employees to explore personal areas of development and also enhance their learning abilities by getting exposed to different situations that strengthens their personal and professional integrity and helps to make them a compact professional. The organisational culture is always influenced by the aspects like professionalism of the staffs, their appearance and attire, company values and beliefs and the aims, goals and objectives of the organisation (Stensaker and Vabo, 2013). Activity 3 Investigating countries through Hofstedes Dimension Model All across the world there are number of countries and all of them have different climatic conditions, different economy and external environment as well as different culture which make each and every country unique in their own way. For international expansion many organisations need to understand the foreign market which is one of the indispensable aspects for the organisation. It is not only important for the organisation to understand the external environment of the country but it is also important for the organisation to understand the culture of the nation which is largely important to make change decisions among the organisational operations effectively. Most of the bigger multinationals focus on understanding the overall environment and the culture which would help to manage the business effectively. Understanding the culture of a place is important for an organisation as it will definitely help to make suitable decisions for the business in not only in the domestic market bu t also in the foreign market. There are number of online tools which are now available for an organisation and the organisation needs to choose a suitable tool which would help to get suitable cultural information. Geert Hofstedes Cultural Dimension Model is one of the effective and suitable tools that help to investigate cultures of different countries (Hsu, Woodside and Marshall, 2013). The Geert Hofstedes Dimension Model has six different dimensions that influence the national culture of the country. The six dimensions are: Power Distance Index, Indulgence vs. Restraint, Long term vs. Short Term, Masculinity vs. Femininity, Tolerance of uncertainty and individuality and collectivism. In the present paper Australia and China have been taken to understand the difference in terms of cultural aspects. Power distance is the aspect which shows the distribution of power in the society and its acceptance by the weaker member of the society. In Australia power distance is low which means it has better and equal distribution of power whereas in China distribution of power is unequal and people largely follow hierarchy. Individualism is the interest of the people to integrate themselves in groups and grow together. As seen from figure 2 Australian societies is much more individualist and tend to look after them rather working in groups and focusing on collective development which is just the opposite in China as they believe growing together with teamwork. Masculinity is indicated in a society by its tendency to be dominating, assertive and strength and both the countries show similar result of being masculine in nature and China is tad higher in rating which means it is focused on building society and dominating other societies and cultures (Minkov and Hofstede, 2012). Countries with higher uncertainty avoidance rating are likely to follow conventional rules and regulations to operate and are not trying to experiment with the culture. In this case it could be said that Australia has higher rating and hence it is much more formal and so it prefers to operate conventionally to avoid uncertain situation in the culture which is just the opposite in China (Venaik and Brewer, 2013). Long term orientation is the tendency of the country to think about the future and in this case Australia is not at all thinking about its long term future and rather focuses on short term goals in the society which is just the opposite of China. Indulgence is high in Australia as the country is open to new ideas and the people are highly focused on leading their life to the fullest and explore the bright side of life which is less visible in China (Brewer and Venaik, 2012). Conclusion Organisational Culture is extremely important for an organisation to grow and develop and hence it is important for the organisation to integrate effective culture. Hence it is important for organisations to understand the concept of culture. Culture is broader perspective could be understood through Hofstedes model of cultural dimension which showed that Australia and China have many things different to each other when China is much more collective then Australia is individualistic, Australia is open to indulgence whereas China is focused on restraining its society to new things. References Brewer, P. and Venaik, S., 2012. On the misuse of national culture dimensions.International Marketing Review,29(6), pp.673-683. Carlstrm, E.D. and Ekman, I., 2012. Organisational culture and change: implementing person-centred care.Journal of health organization and management,26(2), pp.175-191. Hsu, S.Y., Woodside, A.G. and Marshall, R., 2013. Critical tests of multiple theories of cultures consequences: Comparing the usefulness of models by Hofstede, Inglehart and Baker, Schwartz, Steenkamp, as well as GDP and distance for explaining overseas tourism behavior.Journal of Travel Research,52(6), pp.679-704. Huhtala, M., Feldt, T., Hyvnen, K. and Mauno, S., 2013. Ethical organisational culture as a context for managers personal work goals.Journal of Business Ethics,114(2), pp.265-282. Minkov, M. and Hofstede, G., 2012. Is national culture a meaningful concept? Cultural values delineate homogeneous national clusters of in-country regions.Cross-Cultural Research,46(2), pp.133-159. Rameezdeen, R. and Gunarathna, N., 2012. Organisational culture in construction: an employee perspective.Construction Economics and Building,3(1), pp.19-30. Stensaker, B. and Vab, A., 2013. Re?inventing shared governance: Implications for organisational culture and institutional leadership.Higher Education Quarterly,67(3), pp.256-274. Venaik, S. and Brewer, P., 2013. Critical issues in the Hofstede and GLOBE national culture models.International Marketing Review,30(5), pp.469-482.